Chinese Journal of Polar Research ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 482-496.DOI: 10.13679/j.jdyj.20200073

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The spatial variation of net CO2 fluxes (NEE) and their influence factors in tundra in high Arctic

Chen Qingqing1,2, Bao Tao3, Zhu Renbin2, Xu Hua4   

  1. 1 College of Life Science, Resources and Environment, Yichun University, Yichun 336000, China;
    2 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Polar Environment and Global Change, School of Earth and Space Science,
    University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
    3 Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for Temperate East Asia, Institute of Atmospheric Physics,
    Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
    4 State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science,
    Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210091, China
  • Received:2020-11-17 Revised:2021-01-30 Online:2021-12-31 Published:2021-12-16
  • Contact: Zhu Renbin

Abstract:

The release of CO2 from summer ice-free tundra of the high Arctic plays an important role in the global carbon cycle. These net ecosystem exchanges (NEEs) and their influence factors from Seabird Sanctuary Tundra (TSB), Tundra in Non-Seabird Colony (TNS) and Tundra in Transition Zone (TTR) were measured using the closed chamber method during the Fourth Arctic Scientific Exploration (26 July–5 August 2008) in the High Arctic. The spatial variations of NEE show that TSB was a sink for CO2, with an average NEE of (−39.0±6.0) mg·m−2·h−1. Typically, absorption of CO2 in areas with high vegetation cover and strong seabird usage was greater than in areas with lower vegetation cover and seabird usage. In contrast, TNS and TTR were emission sources for CO2, with average NEEs of (12.0±6.3) mg·m−2·h−1 and (40.5±29.3) mg·m−2·h−1, respectively. Highland TTR ((106.4±23.1) mg·m−2·h−1) was the strongest emission source, while peatland TTR [(−58.3±9.5) mg·m−2·h−1] was a strong sink. Spatial variation of NEEs was linked to differences in vegetation cover and hydrological conditions related to seabird activity in all tundra types. Physical and chemical properties of tundra soils also affected NEE values, showing negative correlations with soil moisture (r=−0.44, P=0.003) in TSB and TNS, but a positive correlation with soil temperature (r=0.32, P=0.06) and negative correlations with NH4+-N (P<0.05) and NO3-N (P<0.05) concentrations in TSB.

Key words: CO2, Net CO2 fluxes, Arctic, Ny-?lesund, High Arctic tundra