极地研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 667-679.DOI: 10.13679/j.jdyj.20240022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

南极环境保护委员会组织结构与运作变迁

王婉潞   

  1. 南京大学国际关系学院
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-04 修回日期:2024-06-11 出版日期:2024-12-31 发布日期:2025-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 王婉潞
  • 作者简介:王婉潞, 女, 1988年生。助理研究员, 主要研究方向为全球治理和极地政治。E-mail: wangwanlu@nju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科基金青年项目“极地竞争新态势与我国对策研究”;国家重点研发计划“极地地缘政治风险与我国参与国际治理政策问题研究”

The evolution of the structure and operation of the Committee for Environmental Protection

Wan-Lu WANG   

  1. School of International Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2024-03-04 Revised:2024-06-11 Online:2024-12-31 Published:2025-01-15
  • Contact: Wan-Lu WANG

摘要: 当前, 南极治理决策制定的初步环节逐渐由南极条约体系内部的不同组织与机构完成。作为南极条约体系的重要组成部分, 南极环境保护委员会(Committee for Environmental Protection, CEP)是依据《关于环境保护的南极条约议定书》第11条设立的常设机构, 不享有独立决策权, 其讨论成果最终转化为协商会议通过的措施、决定或决议, 如今CEP已成为协商会议“措施”的最大供给者。自1998年成立以来, CEP的组织结构与运作方式发生了显著变化。早期CEP由年度会议和会间非正式小组构成。随着环境保护与气候变化问题的重要性日益凸显, CEP先后设立两个正式附属小组, 分别负责审议南极特别保护区与南极特别管理区的管理计划, 以及执行气候变化应对工作计划, 并在这两个议题上形成“正式附属小组—CEP—协商会议”的逐级建议结构。基于这种变化, 我国不仅要重视CEP会议最新议题, 更应该重视闭会期间的工作, 特别是培养各层次的专业人才, 让他们有机会深入参与CEP各议题的讨论, 以全面提升我国南极制度性话语权的针对性和有效性。

关键词: 南极治理, 环境保护, 南极环境保护委员会, 南极条约体系

Abstract: Currently, the initial discussions on Antarctic governance decision-making are undertaken by different organizations and institutions within the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS). As an important component of the ATS, the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP) is a permanent body established under Article 11 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty without independent decision-making powers. Since its establishment in 1998, CEP has undergone significant changes in its organizational structure and operations. The early CEP consisted of annual meetings and informal intersessional groups. With the increasing importance of environmental protection and climate change issues, two formal subsidiary groups have been set up, one to review the management plans of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas/Antarctic Specially Managed Areas and the other to implement the Climate Change Response Work Program. On these two issues, a hierarchical recommendation structure of “Formal Subsidiary Group–CEP–Antaractic Treaty Consulative Meeting” has been formed. Based on this change, China should pay attention to the latest CEP issues, and to the work during the intersessional period. In particular, cultivating professionals at all levels should be cultivated, so that they have the opportunity to deeply participate in the various CEP discussions, thus comprehensively improving the pertinence and effectiveness of China’s Antarctic institutional discursive power.

Key words: Antarctic governance, environmental protection, Committee for Environmental Protection, Antarctic Treaty System