极地研究

极地研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 346-363.DOI: 10.13679/j.jdyj.20180049

• 研究进展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CiteSpace的北极研究综述

王利1  杨林生1,2  黄季夏1,3  Jinmei Lu4   

  1. 1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地表层格局与模拟院重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    2.中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3.北京林业大学教育部森林培育与保护重点实验室, 北京100083;
    4.Department of Engineering and Safety, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso 9037, Norway
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-05 修回日期:2018-11-30 出版日期:2019-09-30 发布日期:2019-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 杨林生
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院先导专项(XDA19070502)、中国科学院重点部署项目(ZDRW-ZS-2017-4)、中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所科技计划项目(Y8V80113YZ)资助

A review on the Arctic research using CiteSpace

Wang Li1, Yang Linsheng1,2, Huang Jixia1,3, Jinmei Lu4   

  • Received:2018-09-05 Revised:2018-11-30 Online:2019-09-30 Published:2019-09-30

PDF (PC)

519

摘要： 以北极研究为中心, 基于CNKI和Web of Sciences Core Collection数据库2000—2017数据, 采用CiteSpace, 系统展示了中国和国际(含中国)在北极科研领域的发展趋势、前沿、热点和机构合作特征。研究表明, 国内的北极研究经历了由气候海冰—航运—北极治理的研究过程, 发文量以北极航运为主导。国际针对北极的研究经历了三个逐步加速阶段: 1990、2000和2005, 北极八国和德、英、法是北极研究的主力军。北极科技合作仍主要以国家内部合作为主, 但科研机构合作频率高度爆发且出现一批以“Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research(德国)、The Arctic University of Norway(挪威)、Aarhus University(丹麦)和Korea Polar Research Institute(韩国)”为代表的北极研究合作爆发单位; 北极研究领域多样, 呈现出以“arctic ocean”、“climate”、“arctic temperature”、“variability”、“sea ice”、“model”等为重点的关键词, 表明近年国际北极研究主要热点在气候变化、海冰、洋流等领域, 这些领域相互交叉。通过对国内外北极通航经济性的系统综述分析得出: 国内外学者均认为与北极海冰有关因素是制约北极通航的关键; 国内学者对北极通航的经济效益较为乐观, 而国外学者则较为辨证且谨慎。这与研究所考虑的角度有关, 国内学者较多考虑北极通航的技术管理、人力资源、能耗、时间和政治等因素, 而国外学者在这些因素的基础上, 还侧重于贸易需求、通航意愿性和通航对气候的影响等因素。

关键词: 北极, 科技, CiteSpace, 合作, 通航, 综述

Abstract: Based on the core collection database of the Web of Science (2001–2017), this study used CiteSpace to review Chinese and international research on the Arctic and to elucidate active research trends and patterns of collaboration. In China, Arctic research has transitioned from its original focus on Arctic climate change and sea ice studies, to concerns related to Arctic shipping and, more recently, to Arctic strategy and/or governance. Internationally, research publications related to the Arctic have experienced three periods of significant increase: 1990, 2000 and 2005, dominated by the arctic countries, Germany, the United Kingdom and France. Most collaborations on Arctic research are domestic, although international institutional collaborations have occurred in recent years, exemplified by the Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (Germany), The Arctic University of Norway (Norway), Aarhus University (Denmark) and the Korea Polar Research Institute (South Korea). Hot keywords include “Arctic Ocean,” “climate,” “Arctic temperature,” “variability,” “sea ice” and “model,” indicating the hot research topics are climate change, sea ice, and Arctic oscillation related. Arctic shipping has dominated recent related publications in China. A comparative systematic review of Chinese and international studies on the economic benefits of Arctic shipping revealed that sea ice is the main factor constraining Arctic shipping. In general, Chinese researchers are optimism in terms of economic benefits, international researchers are more pro-dialectic. Chinese studies tend to focus on technical issues, management, human resources, energy consumption, time consumption and navigation, whereas international research additionally considers aspects such as trade demand, willingness for shipping (risks) and climatic impacts.

Key words: Arctic, sciences, CiteSpace, collaboration, shipping, review